OtherPapers.com - Other Term Papers and Free Essays
Search

Gap Inc. in 2010 - Is the Turnaround Strategy Working?

Essay by   •  January 26, 2013  •  Research Paper  •  7,023 Words (29 Pages)  •  2,223 Views

Essay Preview: Gap Inc. in 2010 - Is the Turnaround Strategy Working?

Report this essay
Page 1 of 29

Gap Inc. in 2010: Is the Turnaround Strategy Working?

Business: Offered an extensive selection of "classically styled, high quality casual apparel at moderate price points. Product ranged from wardrobe basics such as khakis and T shirts to fashion apparel, accessories and personal care products for men and women."

Mission Statement: Gap, Inc. is a brand-builder. We create emotional connections with customers around the world through inspiring product design, unique store experiences, and compelling marketing

How to we reach our Mission?

- Improve working conditions in factory -> Cost leadership

- Improve environmental performance

- Globally effective organization

- Career advance opportunities

- Leverage asset to deepen impact

- Differentiation through fashion and brand name besides Gap such as Banana Republic and Old Navy

Business Model

- A key part of our strategy moving forward will be to build vendor capacity to develop human resource management systems

- Improving our partnerships. Work can be greater reach and impact by continuing to engage a broad range of partners, including labor rights groups, trade unions, factory owners and management, governments, non-governmental organizations and other companies

Business Philosophy: We seek to make a positive, lasting impact on the people and in the places where we operate.

Business Principle: doing business responsibly, honestly and ethically. Not only meet legal requirements around the world, but also operate responsibly and with integrity in everything they do.

Corporate Culture:

- Think: customers first - We make decisions with our customers in mind. We connect with our stores and create the quality our customers value and expect

- Inspire: creativity - We think big, take risks and solve problems. We challenge the status quo and always look for new ideas and ways of working

- Do: what's right - We believe that how we do business is as important as what we do. We act with integrity, and we give back to the communities in which we do business

- Deliver: results - We deliver the best result possible - we're committed to taking responsibility, setting priorities and meeting our goals.

Corporate Strategy:

- identify, evaluate and prioritize strategic opportunities for the Gap Inc portfolio

Business Strategy

- Using the differentiation strategy to sell to sophisticated customers who want to purchase moderately priced, high-fashion casual clothing. Gap's strategic success was largely a product of a segmentation strategy wherein the firm attempted to focus stores' offerings on the unique needs of different market

- Have distributors deliver items to stores instead of letting stores carry their own inventories. Regularly review its inventories to identify slow moving merchandise and determine markdown amounts necessary to clear merchandise. -> reduce inventory carrying cost

- E-commerce platform was developed. Websites redesigned to provide greater functionality and a more convenient shopping experience. Using Kiva system, allows its e-commerce division, to process orders faster and with greater accuracy

- Develop Code of Vendor to keep long term relationship with its vendors. To ensure its workers were paid fairly, did not work excessively and in healthy and safe environment.

- International revenue takes up to 18%. Enter into franchise agreements to operate Gap apparel in 20countries

Implementation of Strategy

- Focus on reducing debt to increase dividend payments to shareholders

- Cost cutting to allocate resources to restore Gap brand reputation for style and quality.

Strategic Challenges

- Require to carry a significant amount of inventory even before the beginning of a peak selling season.

Industry Gap Inc. competes in: Apparel

Five Forces Summary

Force: Level:

Rivalry among Existing Firms: High

Threat of New Entrants: Low

Threat of Substitute Products: Moderate

Bargaining Power of Buyers: Moderate

Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Low

Rivalry among Existing Firms: the TJX Companies Inc. (13.4%), Ross store (6.9%), Abercrombie & Fitch (4.1%), American Eagle Outfitters (1%), Gap Inc. (15%). Identifying and being knowledgeable about competitors, and how to overcome obstacles that their competitors place on firms is essential in highly competitive industries. Since the specialty apparel industry is highly competitive amongst existing firms, firms in this industry must focus on industry growth, concentration in their market, differentiation, switching costs, economies of scale, and fixed/variable costs to maintain and/or gain their market share.

Concentration: The main thing companies have to worry about with concentration is the big name companies in the industry who have stores everywhere and hold a lot of the market share as demonstrated below. This strengthens the need to recognize opportunities to expand into these less saturated market areas and further increases rivalry among existing firms.

Differentiation: The attempt is to bring customer's interest back on Gap's unique brand and product image. Product Differentiation is key in this highly competitive market. The firms in operations must maintain their separate images. Ultimately there is a relatively high threat of existing firms when considering the effort firms must exert in brand image differentiation

Threat of New Entrants: Entering a market where there already is tough competition can be a difficult and daunting task. New firms will use such barriers as: economies of scale, first mover advantage, access to the channels of distribution and relationships, and legal barriers. They will use this to help justify their decision on whether or not there is profit to be made in the market. Existing firms have to take the

...

...

Download as:   txt (45.6 Kb)   pdf (427.2 Kb)   docx (29.9 Kb)  
Continue for 28 more pages »
Only available on OtherPapers.com
Citation Generator

(2013, 01). Gap Inc. in 2010 - Is the Turnaround Strategy Working?. OtherPapers.com. Retrieved 01, 2013, from https://www.otherpapers.com/essay/Gap-Inc-in-2010-Is-the-Turnaround/40621.html

"Gap Inc. in 2010 - Is the Turnaround Strategy Working?" OtherPapers.com. 01 2013. 2013. 01 2013 <https://www.otherpapers.com/essay/Gap-Inc-in-2010-Is-the-Turnaround/40621.html>.

"Gap Inc. in 2010 - Is the Turnaround Strategy Working?." OtherPapers.com. OtherPapers.com, 01 2013. Web. 01 2013. <https://www.otherpapers.com/essay/Gap-Inc-in-2010-Is-the-Turnaround/40621.html>.

"Gap Inc. in 2010 - Is the Turnaround Strategy Working?." OtherPapers.com. 01, 2013. Accessed 01, 2013. https://www.otherpapers.com/essay/Gap-Inc-in-2010-Is-the-Turnaround/40621.html.